| 1 |
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a |
| 3 |
> really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask |
| 4 |
> entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able |
| 5 |
> to write a much better one for bcportage. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> So the list of invalid masks is at [1]. |
| 8 |
> The script source is at [2]. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours. Entries in |
| 11 |
> package.mask should have a corresponding ebuild in the tree somewhere. |
| 12 |
> I'd like to see the number of entries chopped by a fair margin. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working on in |
| 15 |
p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this stuff in |
| 16 |
the tree right now. So that has chopped the number of entries by a fair |
| 17 |
margin, but for the script to be useful it should be able to detect they have |
| 18 |
valid ebuilds. |
Archives