Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@l.g.o>, gentoo embedded <gentoo-embedded@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 00:08:05
Message-Id: AANLkTikeUXNxNQQRRzeWTcFFLbLXUQZFVnBO-s_0e_z4@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)] by Enrico Weigelt
1 On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de> wrote:
2 > does he speak for all of you ?
3 >
4 > ----- Forwarded message from bugzilla-daemon@g.o -----
5 >
6 > From: bugzilla-daemon@g.o
7 > Subject: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)
8 > To: weigelt@×××××.de
9 > Reply-To: DO NOT REPLY <devnull@×××××××××.invalid>
10 > Date: Mon,  5 Jul 2010 19:39:48 +0000 (UTC)
11 >
12 > ------- Comment #4 from vapier@g.o  2010-07-05 19:39 0000 -------
13 > lemme clarify further: dont bother submitting ebuilds for any package in
14 > OSS-QM.  we arent interested.
15 >
16
17 The "base-system" team maintains sys-libs/zlib, and he speaks for
18 "base-system". I think it's fairly implicit that he's talking about
19 packages maintained by him, and the teams he is in. Maintainers have
20 the final say w.r.t. packages maintained by them, the rest of us can
21 only give our opinion (except in extenuating circumstances).
22
23 To say it in precise words:
24
25 * He speaks for his packages, not for all packages in-tree.
26 * He speaks for himself, not all maintainers in-tree.
27 * Gentoo is not an anthropomorphic entity with a single coherent
28 opinion on anything unless decided by the council.
29
30 --
31 ~Nirbheek Chauhan
32
33 Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team