Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Feature request: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:40:28
Message-Id: 20120427113656.63ecb9f4@googlemail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Feature request: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force by "Andreas K. Huettel"
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:03:54 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote:
> * two new files in profile directories supported, > package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force > * syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force > * meaning is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force, > except that the resulting rules are ONLY applied iff a stable keyword > is in use
This means that an ebuild will effectively change when moved from ~arch to arch. The point of ~arch is to test ebuilds before they're moved to arch. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Feature request: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>