Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Feature request: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:40:28
Message-Id: 20120427113656.63ecb9f4@googlemail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Feature request: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:03:54 +0200
2 "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote:
3 > * two new files in profile directories supported,
4 > package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force
5 > * syntax is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force
6 > * meaning is identical to package.use.mask and package.use.force,
7 > except that the resulting rules are ONLY applied iff a stable keyword
8 > is in use
9
10 This means that an ebuild will effectively change when moved from ~arch
11 to arch. The point of ~arch is to test ebuilds before they're moved to
12 arch.
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Feature request: package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>