Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/hachoir-parser: ChangeLog hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:20:45
Message-Id: 201009112220.35948.reavertm@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/hachoir-parser: ChangeLog hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild by "Petteri Räty"
On Saturday 11 of September 2010 22:18:32 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 09/11/2010 11:14 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:10:51 +0300 > > > > Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: > >>> + > >>> +*hachoir-parser-1.3.4 (10 Sep 2010) > >>> + > >>> + 10 Sep 2010; Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > >>> <arfrever@g.o> + -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild, > >>> +hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild: + Version bump. > >> > >> Deleting an older version is relevant so it should also be mentioned in > >> the ChangeLog message. > > > > It says -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild. What exactly do you think would be > > gained by adding "Remove old" in this case? > > Following your logic we should not write "Version bump" either (as > that's what happens by default when you add a new ebuild).
Considering the fact, that ChangeLogs are files that contribute to rsync/cvs fetch the most, it's not that bad idea... -- regards MM

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies