Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:09:48
Message-Id: 201106091806.10909.dilfridge@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) by Mike Frysinger
Mike, 

> > If typos matter then they matter to everybody, and if they don't then > > we should not care. QA in Gentoo should be a consistent experience. > > while the last sentence is true, the first is not. if a minority of > people care about typos, and/or they rarely fix said typos, then the > logical answer is that their opinion loses out. it doesnt mean that > everyone agrees. > -mike
you will surely agree then- if a minority of people thinks ebuild removals should not go into the changelog, their opinion just loses out. Right? Anyway. You and Samuli are at the moment just wasting everyone's time here. If you would like to make a productive contribution, I suggest you run and campaign in the upcoming council election. After all, we do have some sort-of democratic process here in Gentoo, and as luck runs, the election is indeed pretty soon (so you might feel able to remove ebuilds already in the near future again). That is the best way to get policies changed and make your point. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer - kde, sci, arm, tex dilfridge@g.o http://www.akhuettel.de/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies