| 1 |
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:36:50 +0200 |
| 2 |
Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> If SCons is unpredictable, then don't provide *any* phases and only |
| 5 |
> functions and rename it to scons-utils to match its purpose. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
It is as predictable as the buildsystem meeting the default phase |
| 8 |
functions requirements -- we can configure it, compile it but no way of |
| 9 |
knowing what should be done in 'install' for sure. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> What I hate is deliberately introduced inconsistency in ebuild API's. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What I hate is replicating bad practices just because someone else did |
| 14 |
that before. If I'm wrong, then please point me the relation between |
| 15 |
a particular buildsystem and patching. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Michał Górny |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
<http://mgorny.alt.pl> |
| 22 |
<xmpp:mgorny@××××××.ru> |
Archives