| 1 |
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 03:34, Kumba wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> //-------------------------- |
| 4 |
> =sys-libs/pam-0.75-r11 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Works fine here - check your C[XX]FLAGS. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> //-------------------------- |
| 10 |
> =net-libs/liblockfile-1.03 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Fixed in -r1. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> //-------------------------- |
| 16 |
> =sys-apps/modutils-2.4.25 |
| 17 |
> =sys-apps/module-init-tools-0.9.12-r1 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Same issue, ill look into it. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> //-------------------------- |
| 24 |
> =sys-apps/parted-1.6.5 |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Notes: Using sys-apps/parted-1.6.5-r1, this problem does not occur. |
| 27 |
> However, -r1 of parted is not yet marked stable or even unstable on x86. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Mark it unstable (or stable if -r0 is such). |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> //-------------------------- |
| 33 |
> =net-analyzer/tcpdump-3.7.2 |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Seems like an issue with the gcc in question's macro parser. I |
| 37 |
will look into this. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> So anyone got any ideas on all this? That's not half bad for ~207 |
| 42 |
> packages. Some of these I don't think are gcc-3.3 issues, but one never |
| 43 |
> knows (like the pam issue). |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Cheers, |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-- |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 52 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 53 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives