Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Doug Klima <cardoe@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:29:21
Message-Id: 4730956A.6050500@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles/updates: 4Q-2007 by Mark Loeser
1 Mark Loeser wrote:
2 > "Hanno Boeck (hanno)" <hanno@g.o> said:
3 >
4 >> hanno 07/11/06 01:01:35
5 >>
6 >> Modified: 4Q-2007
7 >> Log:
8 >> move beryl packages to their corresponding compiz fusion packages
9 >>
10 >> Revision Changes Path
11 >> 1.10 profiles/updates/4Q-2007
12 >>
13 >> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?rev=1.10&view=markup
14 >> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?rev=1.10&content-type=text/plain
15 >> diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?r1=1.9&r2=1.10
16 >>
17 >> Index: 4Q-2007
18 >> ===================================================================
19 >> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007,v
20 >> retrieving revision 1.9
21 >> retrieving revision 1.10
22 >> diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
23 >> --- 4Q-2007 3 Nov 2007 15:35:36 -0000 1.9
24 >> +++ 4Q-2007 6 Nov 2007 01:01:35 -0000 1.10
25 >> @@ -8,3 +8,10 @@
26 >> move x11-apps/compiz-settings x11-apps/ccsm
27 >> move x11-plugins/compiz-extra x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main
28 >> slotmove =app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java-1.4* 1.4.2 1.4
29 >> +move x11-wm/beryl x11-wm/compiz-fusion
30 >> +move x11-wm/beryl-core x11-wm/compiz
31 >> +move x11-plugins/beryl-plugins x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main
32 >> +move x11-plugins/beryl-dbus x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra
33 >> +move x11-misc/beryl-settings-bindings x11-libs/compizconfig-python
34 >> +move x11-misc/beryl-settings x11-libs/libcompizconfig
35 >> +move x11-misc/beryl-manager x11-apps/ccsm
36 >>
37 >
38 > Just to get a wider audience involved in this...this just seems wrong to
39 > do. There is a QA bug open about it as well:
40 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198248
41 >
42 > What are other people's feelings on using package moves to forcibly
43 > migrate people like this? It also sounds like this wasn't announced at
44 > all and the packages just left the tree.
45 >
46 >
47 Except the packages referenced are simply the same upstream project just
48 renamed... so it is correct.
49 --
50 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list