1 |
Mark Loeser wrote: |
2 |
> "Hanno Boeck (hanno)" <hanno@g.o> said: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> hanno 07/11/06 01:01:35 |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Modified: 4Q-2007 |
7 |
>> Log: |
8 |
>> move beryl packages to their corresponding compiz fusion packages |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Revision Changes Path |
11 |
>> 1.10 profiles/updates/4Q-2007 |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?rev=1.10&view=markup |
14 |
>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?rev=1.10&content-type=text/plain |
15 |
>> diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007?r1=1.9&r2=1.10 |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> Index: 4Q-2007 |
18 |
>> =================================================================== |
19 |
>> RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/updates/4Q-2007,v |
20 |
>> retrieving revision 1.9 |
21 |
>> retrieving revision 1.10 |
22 |
>> diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10 |
23 |
>> --- 4Q-2007 3 Nov 2007 15:35:36 -0000 1.9 |
24 |
>> +++ 4Q-2007 6 Nov 2007 01:01:35 -0000 1.10 |
25 |
>> @@ -8,3 +8,10 @@ |
26 |
>> move x11-apps/compiz-settings x11-apps/ccsm |
27 |
>> move x11-plugins/compiz-extra x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main |
28 |
>> slotmove =app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java-1.4* 1.4.2 1.4 |
29 |
>> +move x11-wm/beryl x11-wm/compiz-fusion |
30 |
>> +move x11-wm/beryl-core x11-wm/compiz |
31 |
>> +move x11-plugins/beryl-plugins x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-main |
32 |
>> +move x11-plugins/beryl-dbus x11-plugins/compiz-fusion-plugins-extra |
33 |
>> +move x11-misc/beryl-settings-bindings x11-libs/compizconfig-python |
34 |
>> +move x11-misc/beryl-settings x11-libs/libcompizconfig |
35 |
>> +move x11-misc/beryl-manager x11-apps/ccsm |
36 |
>> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Just to get a wider audience involved in this...this just seems wrong to |
39 |
> do. There is a QA bug open about it as well: |
40 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198248 |
41 |
> |
42 |
> What are other people's feelings on using package moves to forcibly |
43 |
> migrate people like this? It also sounds like this wasn't announced at |
44 |
> all and the packages just left the tree. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |
47 |
Except the packages referenced are simply the same upstream project just |
48 |
renamed... so it is correct. |
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |