Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:31:08
Message-Id: 200507011528.36206.danarmak@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Friday 01 July 2005 12:15, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2 > On Thursday 30 June 2005 23:11, Dan Armak wrote:
3 > > Instead of 'exit 1', qt_min_version should use die. I use that in
4 > > deprange and it does work inside $DEPEND.
5 >
6 > Wouldn't this be a good time to implement actual dependency ranges in
7 > portage.
8 Wouldn't any time be a good time? :-)
9
10 > Btw. I normally use the following hack that portage might
11 > actually be made to understand:
12 >
13 > DEPEND="<x11-libs/qt-4.0 !<x11-libs/qt-3.2.1"
14 This depends on the fact that we don't actually have different-slotted
15 versions of QT <3.2.1 in portage. If we still had eg qt 2.x, this would block
16 it. So it's a temporary hack that'll only work for QT based on the fact that
17 all qt 3.x versions have the same slot.
18
19 --
20 Dan Armak
21 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
22 Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
23 Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>