1 |
On 12/16/2011 06:06 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote: |
3 |
>> Hi, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add |
6 |
>> arches after a "time out". |
7 |
> Personally, I agree with have "more stable packages in tree", but I just point |
8 |
> out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild issue(s) and |
9 |
> maintainers does not care of it, makes no sense imho. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I mark stable with a script and I'm uncomfortable to fix them. As Justin said, |
12 |
> all maintainers are responsible of their packages, so I'd prefer to not touch |
13 |
> other stuff. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> If you(for any developers) are busy and/or you can't fix them, feel free to |
16 |
> mail me or just give an "ack" via irc and I'll provide to fix. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Regards |
19 |
> Agostino |
20 |
Hi ago, |
21 |
|
22 |
Does your script do any checking on the quality of the ebuild, eg that |
23 |
it respects C/LDFLAGS. If so, that's useful and would help package |
24 |
maintainers to better prepare their ebuilds for stabilization. |
25 |
|
26 |
And congrats on making dev :) |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
30 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
31 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
32 |
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535 |
33 |
GnuPG ID : D0455535 |