Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:27:19
Message-Id: 4E739483.5080107@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] x32 fun pants by Mike Frysinger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/16/11 20:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:06:25 Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 09/16/11 10:58, Stratos Psomadakis wrote: >>> On 09/16/2011 10:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:35:55 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: >>>>>> PS why not merge all x86 abis into one keyword? because >>>>>> x86_32 x86_64 x86_x32 are only abis of x86. Also we dont >>>>>> have different keywords for different mips abis (64bit >>>>>> and 32bit ones) >>>>> >>>>> that'd be nice :) >>>> >>>> Seems even acceptable. Not sane but acceptable. People tend >>>> to keyword packages both '~amd64 ~x86' testing them on amd64 >>>> only; amd64 users tend to get sad when someone keyworded a >>>> package '~x86' only. >>>> >>>> On the other hand, it'd be good to have ABI sub-keywords >>>> then. Something like 'x86:x86 -*' if a package is actually >>>> x86-only. >>> >>> I guess there are only a few cases where a package should be >>> keyworded for eg x86, but not for amd64, so these few cases can >>> be handled by p.masks, right? >>> >>> So, we can have a single x86 keyword, and a single x86 >>> 'parent' profile, and subprofiles for x86(or x86_32), amd64, >>> and x32. >>> >>> I guess it's not that simple, but I think that's how the mips >>> profiles work? >> >> I am a bit confused by your proposal. Do you suggest to drop >> 'amd64' and use x86(parent)/amd64(subprofile)(for x86_64) >> instead? > > that would be ideal, and drop "amd64" in the process: x86/x86_64/ > -mike
Ok so we will probably have the following multilib options * x86(ABI=x86_32{/lib}) + amd64(ABI=x86_64{lib64/}) + x32(ABI=x32{/libx32}) * x86/amd64 ( what we already have in amd64 multilib ) * x86/x32 and * x86 (no multilib for 32-bit processors ) ( what we already have in x86 profile ) Sounds doable - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOc5SDAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCHnYQAKuMpYvTWv4waSd503vfBjlb yHPUK+Hd9itz47I3lNmxqZGl7sQxIYm6Ht6MWs3qPIrwI60biUK/vH7dK0q1dnF9 x/zSEFc6hG4nyZ94oeTtsxV7Ttsk9QK/JY2Vm1ulBbEWJeb8sfQD1lesRFV++YZn Xeu3fMKkWoW/2m68nng7Rzfbxf2TvE7bdY3loefpXgMZf6kz7LSkNV1QidEwzs7V yZ9C4N8G8FVFysDykqGbYKMTtn70CCKI1HZ608NY7msWm6LADwpYQYsGENX04l2O xNpW1r+2bhSICT2TGzxIEsbspStH8g4XmRvIdXyZCbCecOyWRaAcBk9x6dY+6ZjB mZkzauSiXGFQcVjjXdXqL1pT2NGEoGe5eWi4daH4cy/12ND76/Gt79HogBUznWTX 5A50jyEjMMHcQjDxvWOyCGvq7yxU3Njs3mNzImEmbR3j3PwlniaFs3Vz76o6yEfE mJ0gaVP50XTDncsK9G4nrgJHKdA7BHOlWL50HXv0rsBHxkQyhsEiw5VaZUF7kOPr R2JptEh9Kh2JyV+EfF/m74Y3Ht0jaXY0MQXV5fl5QxvavRb7WX/mzVXwjY+IlnPB sJUcHkcNLNhm98e5j/CLn0T3DtmfqvnXSfF10wFztoUGDVOUuixVMo+ZvnGYdnH4 E4shmoxTlL7J5CzSEvpu =wlRl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: x32 fun pants Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>