| 1 |
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read |
| 3 |
> the thread. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
"normal" is not the same thing as "always". unless you're the maintainer, you |
| 6 |
have no idea whether old versions are kept there on purpose. ive had people |
| 7 |
delete older versions of packages on me simply because they made this invalid |
| 8 |
assumption without talking to the maintainer. the rest of the thread is |
| 9 |
irrelevant as this point was not made. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
a quick check of your list shows wine/uclibc shouldnt be blindly culled. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Live ebuilds shouldn't really have been in the original list |
| 14 |
> with my intended logic. For them I will usually just migrate them to |
| 15 |
> EAPI 2 like with other packages we have been touching. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
OK |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Using a tracker bug makes sense if you expect some action from individual |
| 20 |
> maintainers which is not the case here as they can just leave the job to |
| 21 |
> people nuking built_with_use like me. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
i dont plan on fixing my ebuilds soonish since this isnt a terribly important |
| 24 |
issue, but they'll get fixed at some point |
| 25 |
-mike |
Archives