1 |
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 01:54 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
6 |
> > El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: |
7 |
> >> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote: |
8 |
> >>> Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with |
9 |
> >>> revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken |
10 |
> >>> packages with tests)? |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to check for ABI changes, like |
13 |
> >> the pre_pkg_preinst_abi_check phase suggested here: |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192319#c20 |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > I guess, that phase would detect ABI change and package manager |
18 |
> > would know how to handle it by itself? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Yeah, it would be like a warning system, do detect cases when the |
21 |
> SLOT/ABI_SLOT were not bumped when they should have been. The idea is |
22 |
> that the developer who's doing the version bump will see the warning |
23 |
> and bump the SLOT/ABI_SLOT before committing the ebuild. |
24 |
> - -- |
25 |
> Thanks, |
26 |
> Zac |
27 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
29 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
30 |
> |
31 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAk/PGt4ACgkQ/ejvha5XGaMt8QCffullYkU7EQXeE7TeUri4nQya |
32 |
> ysIAoMhPQT+rEZbxKNvMiX8qNOEndiM1 |
33 |
> =V7Tz |
34 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
And once we bump SLOT/ABI_SLOT, package manager would know about how to |
39 |
handle that situation and rebuild needed stuff? |
40 |
|
41 |
If we use SLOT only, I guess we would need to allow (or make more |
42 |
common) pulling multiple slot but all of them mutually exclusive no? I |
43 |
have no problem with that of course, but I thought it wasn't "desired" |
44 |
in general. |