| 1 |
On 01/24/2010 03:02 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2010/1/24 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>: |
| 3 |
>> The meaning of the system set is to have only the packages directly |
| 4 |
>> required to have a minimal functioning system. Having python by itself |
| 5 |
>> is not a requirement for that but having package management is. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> You can't have functioning package management without the hard |
| 8 |
> dependencies it requires. So both portage and python should be in the |
| 9 |
> system set. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Cheers, |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Why should we keep redundant information in the list? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Regards, |
| 16 |
Petteri |
Archives