| 1 |
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:54:19 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > And since when was "Implemented in Portage" a requirement for an |
| 4 |
> > EAPI feature? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Remember EAPI4 and features which had reference implementation not |
| 7 |
> in portage? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Actually, yes, since that was "most of them". Nearly all of them got |
| 10 |
implemented quickly. Our policy on this has always been "ask Zac |
| 11 |
whether he thinks they're reasonably quick to implement". |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
But you know this, so kindly keep your disruption to places where |
| 14 |
you're right. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives