Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:28:15
Message-Id: 4E96226D.8060807@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger schrieb:
2 >> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time.
3 >
4 > by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the tree
5 > with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the depgraph.
6
7 The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before.
8
9
10 Best regards,
11 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Replies