Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request)
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:41:36
Message-Id: 201106091240.47628.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) by "Andreas K. Huettel"
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:06:02 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > > If typos matter then they matter to everybody, and if they don't then > > > we should not care. QA in Gentoo should be a consistent experience. > > > > while the last sentence is true, the first is not. if a minority of > > people care about typos, and/or they rarely fix said typos, then the > > logical answer is that their opinion loses out. it doesnt mean that > > everyone agrees. > > you will surely agree then- if a minority of people thinks ebuild removals > should not go into the changelog, their opinion just loses out. Right?
what exactly is your point ? nowhere did i say i wasnt going to follow the new policy in this case. this e-mail is, as you said yourself, a waste of time. -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation - pros and cons (council discussion request) Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>