| 1 |
Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> eclass has ChangeLog file now. any particular reason why you skipped it? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Completely oblivious to its existence, that's all :) I'll |
| 5 |
(hopefully) remember it next time. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> or is it not meant to be used yet / not mandatory to use yet? since most |
| 8 |
> people seem to skip it. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
In my case it was entirely ignorance, and with no statistical |
| 11 |
evidence to base my assertion I'll say that most other omissions |
| 12 |
come from the same cause. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Though on the other hand you could argue that a Changelog for all |
| 15 |
eclasses may be a bit overkill. Most eclasses are not related to |
| 16 |
one another, so reading the CVS history of the changes to a |
| 17 |
single file is much more useful than having a big list of |
| 18 |
unrelated changes. A changelog becomes much more useful when |
| 19 |
you need to make related commits to multiple files with a |
| 20 |
non-atomic-commit system like CVS. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Jim Ramsay |
| 24 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox/fluxbox/gkrellm) |
Archives