Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Morgan Christiansson <sft3905@××××××××××××.se>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for updates to dodoc
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:22:25
Message-Id: 3BAFDC0C.3000301@post.netlink.se
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for updates to dodoc by Daniel Robbins
Daniel Robbins wrote:

>On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:35:11PM +0200, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: > >>The dodoc command in ebuilds should handle HTML files a lot better than it >>does now. Instead of naively compressing html files, they should be put >>/usr/share/doc/${P}/html instead. This would be a very simple fix, if it >>wasn't for the fact that we sometimes want to copy entire HTML-trees with >>image files and all (such as the documentation for python or qt). >> > >I'm ok with doing this; would you be willing to improve dodoc and post your >improvements here? As long as they are sane, I doubt anyone will complain >and I'll roll them into the next version of Portage. > >Best Regards, >
Browsers can handle .html.gz, but the links will need to be modified. Also i noticed that mozilla 0.9.4 prompt's to save files by default, i know that it can handle gzip comressed content however.