| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:31:08 +0300 |
| 4 |
> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: |
| 6 |
> > > and cardoe's earlier request to the council ml, can the council |
| 7 |
> > > members discuss this proposal and consider voting it? |
| 8 |
> > > Does anyone have any objections to this proposal? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I won't approve it for use in the tree before it's written as a GLEP |
| 11 |
> > in order to avoid the fiasco with EAPI 1 (it's still not documented |
| 12 |
> > properly). I can however approve the list of items. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> What about the PMS EAPI 1 documentation do you consider 'not proper'? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I was personally expecting to see some sort of section called "EAPI-1" |
| 17 |
that contains something like: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
"EAPI-1 consists of EAPI-0 with the following features added..." |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Then an explanation of each change and the appropriate syntax. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I did see how EAPI-1 is integrated throughout the document, which is |
| 24 |
valuable in a different way - but it's harder to answer the question |
| 25 |
"What exactly does EAPI-1 add to EAPI-0?" |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Perhaps I'll try sending you a patch with something like that, if I |
| 28 |
have time, and if it would be appreciated. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Jim Ramsay |
| 32 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) |
Archives