1 |
Roy Marples posted <1117110163.21483.11.camel@××××××××××.ubernet>, |
2 |
excerpted below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 13:22:43 +0100: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 02:08 -0700, Duncan wrote: |
5 |
>> Hmm.. I /did/ have issues with parallel startup a couple revisions |
6 |
>> back. I had disabled that and haven't reenabled it yet. I suppose I |
7 |
>> should do that and bug it now, if it still fails. It /was/ working at |
8 |
>> one point. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> There may still be issues with parallel startup. It doesn't really startup |
11 |
> in parallel and it's not much faster, so if any bugs do come up then we'll |
12 |
> probably recommend turning it off. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> baselayout-1.12.0-alpha3 will have much improved parallel startup thanks |
15 |
> to Paul Pacheco patch (bug #69854) which is essentially a re-write of the |
16 |
> code so we're not that interested in fixing parallel startup in |
17 |
> baselayout-1.11.x at this time. |
18 |
|
19 |
OK, cool! Gives me an excuse to not worry about it for a bit longer. <g> |
20 |
(I had found pretty much exactly what you mentioned, that it wasn't much |
21 |
faster anyway, the reason I hadn't squawked when it failed and I had to |
22 |
turn it off.) |
23 |
|
24 |
That's good, since I read I have new KDE to worry about next week, and |
25 |
I've a couple things to trace b4 then (unsermake doesn't seem to be |
26 |
engaging, here, for some reason, and it'd be real nice if I could figure |
27 |
out how to get the old configcache patch working (locally, anyway) again |
28 |
with the split sandbox, since the portage upgrade with that integrated |
29 |
doesn't seem to be on the immediate horizon.) |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
33 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
34 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
35 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |