1 |
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 09/18/2011 13:26, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> I don't see how this is relevant to the problem of udev and /usr at |
6 |
>> all. Unless you want to go back to the days of devfs and lots of |
7 |
>> manual configuration. :) |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Me either (somewhat). But I do see is this: If udev is going to make it a |
11 |
> requirement that one or more paritions be available at udevd start time, |
12 |
> then maybe going back to devfs might not be such a bad idea after all. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I use plain vanilla setups on almost any Linux box I build. For x86, LILO |
15 |
> (yes, that thing), a simple kernel, most hardware built in, some extraneous |
16 |
> stuff built as modules. sysvinit for the init package, /{usr,home,var,tmp} |
17 |
> on separate partitions, no X11, no gnome, no KDE, no Xfce, no fluxbox, no |
18 |
> IRIS Indigo, no aewm++, no CDE, no DBUS, no audio support (the machine |
19 |
> doesn't even have an audio card), headless (except with it messes up, which |
20 |
> is very rare), etc. I.e., I run my box like a server. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> My MIPS systems (the working ones, anyways) are even more vanilla. I |
23 |
> netboot each of them off my x86 box versus using a bootloader, they have |
24 |
> what amounts to a minimal Gentoo install, system + plus other utilities, |
25 |
> definitely no X11, etc. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> These setups are pretty much plain vanilla Linux/UNIX setups, and it's what |
28 |
> has worked for years, so I don't see a need to change it with a permanence. |
29 |
> If other distros want to create alternatives, that is fine. But *I* should |
30 |
> retain the choice to use or not to use those alternatives. That means, udev |
31 |
> needs to be configurable enough to allow me to make it _not_ require /usr |
32 |
> being available. Let the default be the other way -- that's fine. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> But if udev upstream is taking *away* choice, and making /usr mandatory |
35 |
> (especially if it's because some other distro has this offbeat, utopian, |
36 |
> überDesktop concept), then that's a bug and someone needs to write a patch |
37 |
> and send it upstream. |
38 |
|
39 |
I think the list you want is |
40 |
linux-hotplug-devel@×××××××××××××××××.net; the gentoo-dev list is not |
41 |
for udev development. If 'someone' needs to write a patch then I |
42 |
assume you will volunteer? |
43 |
|
44 |
> |
45 |
> -- |
46 |
> Joshua Kinard |
47 |
> Gentoo/MIPS |
48 |
> kumba@g.o |
49 |
> 4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28 |
50 |
> |
51 |
> "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And |
52 |
> our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between." |
53 |
> |
54 |
> --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic |
55 |
> |
56 |
> |