1 |
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:04:46 -0300 |
2 |
Guilherme Amadio <amadio@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:08:47PM +0200, David Seifert wrote: |
5 |
> > Dear friends, |
6 |
> > while version bumping sci-libs/fftw, I've noticed our CPU_FLAGS_X86 |
7 |
> > list could be expanded a bit: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I like the idea of expanding the list of CPU_FLAGS_X86, and having flags |
10 |
> for other arches too, but I would be in favor of dropping the _X86 |
11 |
> suffix and using CPU_FLAGS for all arches. Your machine most likely will |
12 |
> only have one kind anyway. Not sure what others think about it, though. |
13 |
|
14 |
One kind is the reason why they are split -- so we can hide |
15 |
CPU_FLAGS_X86 on non-x86 CPUs etc. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Best regards, |
19 |
Michał Górny |
20 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |