| 1 |
The 24/11/12, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> No. Being consistently stupid is not a good reason to be consistent. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Stop being fallacious, please. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> And since as I said the RUBY_TARGETS interface is designed to be _usable |
| 8 |
> by Ruby developers_, being consistent and breaking that, is not |
| 9 |
> something I would care about. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The request is for Gentoo administration. So, talking about developers |
| 12 |
of a language is not the question. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I am a ruby developer and having ruby18 or ruby_1_8 is not much a |
| 15 |
problem. There are a lot of package names not matching a command name |
| 16 |
and it's not a problem either. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Talking of ruby developers when it comes to Gentoo admins is wrong. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Nicolas Sebrecht |
Archives