1 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn schrieb: |
2 |
> I don't say it is a correct use of versionator.eclass. I just say it has |
3 |
> become (unintentionally) part of the API, and therefore is subject to the |
4 |
> rules about changing APIs in eclasses. |
5 |
|
6 |
Actually, after reading those rules[1] again, it would be enough to fix all |
7 |
ebuilds in the tree and wait 30 days to be in compliance with eclass policy. |
8 |
|
9 |
So from my side I will no longer object to your proposed change, provided |
10 |
these conditions are met. |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
Best regards, |
14 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
15 |
|
16 |
[1] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/ |