| 1 |
On 08-10-2011 11:05:08 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> If the extra 16 days will actually accomplish something beyond just |
| 3 |
> delaying libpng then we can debate the finer points of policy. |
| 4 |
> However, if we're just arguing policy for its own sake then I don't |
| 5 |
> see the value. Perhaps a package maintainer might have the "right" to |
| 6 |
> a few weeks to fix things, but in the end you have to put the distro |
| 7 |
> and its users first. You can do that either by speaking up or |
| 8 |
> standing aside, but if you're going to speak up, then make sure you |
| 9 |
> can follow through. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It seems to me like you say here that any policy that Gentoo has that |
| 12 |
you just don't like can be ignored because, well, you just don't like |
| 13 |
it. |
| 14 |
We can discuss whether or not the policy is ok, but should we ignore the |
| 15 |
policy for that reason? I think not. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 20 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives