1 |
On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote: |
2 |
> 2012/6/17 Justin <jlec@g.o>: |
3 |
>> On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote: |
4 |
>>> Hi, |
5 |
>>> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I |
6 |
>>> flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix |
7 |
>>> bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function to |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Is this really necessary? I never experienced any problems which need |
10 |
>> this when following the guides. I looks like a hack, because something |
11 |
>> else is borked. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I've just hit binutils on OpenBSD not finding libdl.so installed in |
14 |
> $EPREFIX/usr/lib/ because of this. |
15 |
> Don't tell me that OpenBSD prefix is unsupported, i'm working on |
16 |
> getting it supported. |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
I am still not convinced. libdl.so is provided by glibc, at least on my |
20 |
linux system. And glibc is one of the rare packages which needs to be |
21 |
provided by the host system instead of being installed in the prefix. |
22 |
|
23 |
Is there something different on BSD which makes libdl.so appear inside |
24 |
the prefix? |
25 |
|
26 |
justin |