1 |
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On L, 2011-11-26 at 12:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
3 |
>> A question: it currently restricts only on the basis of If-Installed, |
4 |
>> but is there a workaround for the absence Display-If-Visible filter? |
5 |
>> If there isn't, I'll commit it as-is. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I think it'd be bad to get the news item out like that now for stable |
8 |
> users, and then after a long time once we stabilize it (if ever), it's |
9 |
> been long forgotten and marked away as read. Maybe the keyword checks |
10 |
> should be re-added for now and edited away later if necessary (before |
11 |
> stabling)? |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
I actually removed that keyword thing because I wasn't sure if it |
15 |
worked with ~arch specifiers. I think it's easier to just bump the |
16 |
news file version when we stabilize 3.2 so that people see it again. |
17 |
Presuming that that will work. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
21 |
|
22 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |