1 |
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do? |
2 |
|
3 |
On 1/28/07, Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> Hi, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> As we all notice from time to time, amd64 team is lacking behind a bit, |
7 |
> due to various reasons. a) manpower, b) a lot of keywording. |
8 |
> Java team asked arch teams if they object when Java team marks stable |
9 |
> generation-2 ebuilds on their own, due to the long time it takes and to |
10 |
> the amount of ebuilds to be stabilised. |
11 |
> So, maybe we can discuss here another helping hand for amd64. Devs |
12 |
> that work with a given software (not necessarily the maintainer) on |
13 |
> amd64 architecture and when there is a keywording bug open, then said |
14 |
> devs can keyword the ebuild. For a short period of time this could be |
15 |
> allowed to all devs. |
16 |
> Any objections? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> V-Li |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |