Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About wormo's situation?
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:06:46
Message-Id: 1284716029.6406.0.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About wormo's situation? by Jeremy Olexa
El jue, 16-09-2010 a las 16:20 -0500, Jeremy Olexa escribió:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:12:10 +0200, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> > wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have seen some package metadatas still referring to wormo as their > > maintainer: > > $ grep -r wormo */*/metada* > > app-admin/ulogd/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email> > > app-arch/pdv/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email> > > www-client/lynx/metadata.xml: <email>wormo@g.o</email> > > > > > > But, reading http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72682 looks like she > > retired some time ago. What is her real situation? Should that packages > > be moved to maintainer-needed (if nobody cares about them)? > > > > Please note that this problem appeared because a user mailed us about > > some unresolved problem with ulogd since a lot of time. > > > > Thanks a lot for clarifying this :-) > > Quote from bug: "..increase her activity by proxy-maintaining some > packages" and > http://bugs.gentoo.org/custom_userhistory.cgi?matchstr=wormo@g.o > shows recent activity. So, I don't know..have you tried contacting her > via direct email? :) Otherwise if there is no action on bugs, I'd wager > that it is 'ok' for you to fix - especially if you communicate and > willing to fix what you break. > > -Jeremy > >
OK, sorry for the inconvenience (also to jlec, that has also replied to this), I misinterpreted wormo retirement bug report Thanks for your help

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature