| 1 |
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 13:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:11:28 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Looks like you have now opted to use Brian's comment as a kind of |
| 5 |
> > "shield" of similar and discuss only about multilib, even when this |
| 6 |
> > thread was more general and we were talking to the problems shown in |
| 7 |
> > recent discussions (from forcing rebuilds issue, optional deps |
| 8 |
> > problems to some trivial questions like know where we can see what |
| 9 |
> > things are being worked out for eapi5). |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> For optional deps, we're close to having two proposals. That's moving |
| 12 |
> forwards. Whether or not it will be in EAPI 5 depends solely upon |
| 13 |
> timing, and whether the Council ends up liking at least one of the two |
| 14 |
> proposals. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> For "forced rebuilds", there's a proposal already, and Zac has just |
| 17 |
> done implementation work, and most of the PMS patch was written ages |
| 18 |
> ago for kdebuild-1 and the original EAPI 3. So again, whether or not |
| 19 |
> that ends up in EAPI 5 is just a matter of timing and Council approval. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> For "what's being worked on", you just need to look at the PMS list. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> So I'm really not sure what your problem is there... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Your cynicism, that is the problem I see |
Archives