Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:23:51
Message-Id: 4E96BC0B.60809@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by Mike Frysinger
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
>>> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the >>> tree with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the >>> depgraph. >> The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. > which is what i said
So qutecom is not broken and needs not be removed as long as <linux-headers-2.6.38 is in the tree. Of course any package breaks when you remove its dependencies. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Replies