Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:47:45
Message-Id: CAGfcS_m3=UEtqDdL4HPTAZba9+XwXLjW-HimZEuCyos7QgPfQQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries by hasufell
1 On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:44 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 02/21/2015 10:16 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
3 >> Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015, 20:16:31 schrieb hasufell:
4 >>
5 >>> What did the council say again about the functionality of the team?
6 >>> What's the argumentation to not do anything, except deciding policies
7 >>> over it's head?
8 >>
9 >> functionality != willingness to interact with others
10 >>
11 >
12 > So if a project ignores the community, the council, the QA team AND
13 > violates GLEP39, we allow that, because they still do commits?
14
15 Nobody is ignoring anything. Council/QA has stepped in to clean things up.
16
17 What specific action are you advocating for which hasn't been done?
18
19 --
20 Rich

Replies