1 |
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 17:57 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
2 |
> On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: |
3 |
> > scarabeus 12/02/20 15:57:31 |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Modified: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog |
6 |
> > Log: |
7 |
> > Use single thread build as it is broken in paralel on some machines wrt bug#405029. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha87/cvs/Linux x86_64) |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Revision Changes Path |
12 |
> > 1.2 dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&view=markup |
15 |
> > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain |
16 |
> > diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Index: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild |
19 |
> > =================================================================== |
20 |
> > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v |
21 |
> > retrieving revision 1.1 |
22 |
> > retrieving revision 1.2 |
23 |
> > diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 |
24 |
> > --- libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 10:21:59 -0000 1.1 |
25 |
> > +++ libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild 20 Feb 2012 15:57:31 -0000 1.2 |
26 |
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ |
27 |
> > # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation |
28 |
> > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 |
29 |
> > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.1 2012/02/20 10:21:59 scarabeus Exp $ |
30 |
> > +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.2 2012/02/20 15:57:31 scarabeus Exp $ |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > EAPI=4 |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README" |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > +MAKEOPTS="-j1" |
39 |
> > + |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Why not use MAKEOPTS="${MAKEOPTS} -j1" to allow other make flags get |
42 |
> respected? |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
About this, I would also like to know if we are allowed to use "MAKEOPTS |
46 |
+=..." (and the same for other variables in ebuild) instead or it should |
47 |
be avoided for some reason. |
48 |
|
49 |
Thanks for the info :) |