| 1 |
On 11/16/2016 10:02 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On 10/30/2016, in message <3d0d574c-63b1-cf2d-633f-d18495202ec3@g.o>, |
| 5 |
>> Brian Evans wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>> We just had a user in #gentoo report that app-dicts/myspell-en had a |
| 8 |
>>> mismatched ChangeLog size in Manifest that blocked him from installing |
| 9 |
>>> software. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>>> So this does not seem to be treated as a warning for a MISC type. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The question is if stable Portage of one year ago (that would be |
| 14 |
> version 2.2.20, I believe) treats this correctly. If it doesn't, |
| 15 |
> the upgrade path is broken. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Ulrich |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Non-existent MISC files are ignored. |
| 21 |
But when they do exist, they are checked like every other file which may |
| 22 |
be a misinterpretation of the GLEP. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Removing the ChangeLogs will not break portage even if they still exist |
| 25 |
in the Manifest. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Brian |
Archives