1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
I was wondering, wouldn't it be better to keep patches that are |
4 |
gzipped in the distfiles directory, since cvs doesn't really work well |
5 |
w/ binary files? I mean, I figure the only patches that should even be |
6 |
managed by cvs are ones we create ourselves, and under normal |
7 |
circumstances, those wouldn't be terribly large, so they could go w/o |
8 |
being gzipped. And since most people update their portage tree using |
9 |
rsync -z, they would be compressed before being sent over the network, |
10 |
so that shouldn't cost too much extra bandwidth. |
11 |
|
12 |
Pete |