1 |
What's your starting point? A raw system straight from a tar-ball off a CD or |
2 |
have you already bootstrapped once and are trying again to make use of the |
3 |
athlon-specific optimization flags? |
4 |
|
5 |
If the answer is 1) then it's odd since it seems quite a few people (including |
6 |
myself) have been able to bootstrap with gcc-3.1 You may want to review your |
7 |
optimization flags, however since the sse-stuff will change the abi and could |
8 |
lead to various problems in the future. |
9 |
|
10 |
If the answer is 2) then that's a known problem: search the list archives at |
11 |
http://fireserver.ath.cx/gentoo/search/index.html for more info. |
12 |
|
13 |
Oh, and I did bootstrap w. binutils 2.12. |
14 |
|
15 |
/Lasse |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
On Tue, 28 May 2002 07:18, Webmaster Refstart.NL wrote: |
19 |
> Hi all, |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I try to set up a GCC 3.1 based Gentoo system with binutils 2.12. When I |
22 |
> try to run ./scripts/bootstrap in the directory /usr/portage, I get errors |
23 |
> when compiling glibc (sorry, I can't c/p the output). I've the following |
24 |
> compile flags in /etc/make.conf: |
25 |
> |
26 |
> CHOST = i686-pc-linux-gnu |
27 |
> CXXFLAGS = -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe |
28 |
> CFLAGS = -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3 -pipe |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Is this a bug in glibc or should I use binutils 2.11 (without the combreloc |
31 |
> tweak)? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Thanks in advance, |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Niek. |
36 |
> _______________________________________________ |
37 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
39 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |