| 1 |
On 2010.04.03 10:16, Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hell no, but ... |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up in a positive |
| 5 |
> way. |
| 6 |
> Summing it up the negative way one might say, we have lots of areas |
| 7 |
> were |
| 8 |
> users might get the idea Gentoo already is dead. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> For example: |
| 11 |
[snip lots of anecdotal evidence] |
| 12 |
> - Tobias |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> -- |
| 15 |
> Praxisbuch Nagios |
| 16 |
> http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/pbnagiosger/ |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Scherbaum |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
First, we need some metrics - the first step to controlling anything is |
| 22 |
to measure it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Once we have some metrics, we can prioritise. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
With priorities, we can identify gaps in our resource pool (not just |
| 27 |
people) and attempt to fill them with recruiting. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Maybe thats a bugday topic ? |
| 30 |
An open day for users who would like to become contributors and |
| 31 |
contributors who would like to become devs. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Regards, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Roy Bamford |
| 37 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 38 |
gentoo-ops |
| 39 |
forum-mods |
| 40 |
trustees |
Archives