1 |
Mark Loeser wrote: |
2 |
<snip> |
3 |
|
4 |
I really don't understand why it is better to break the stable trees of |
5 |
$ARCH instead of just making them all ~ARCH. (ie. ~mips, ~x86-fbsd, |
6 |
etc). If the $ARCH doesn't have the manpower to do stable reqs then they |
7 |
don't have the manpower to fix broken stable trees either or do security |
8 |
bugs. So, IMHO, this proposal doesn't solve anything. With the key |
9 |
problem being that the 'slacker' arches can't keep up with the stable |
10 |
reqs and hence a large number of stale ebuilds and stale bugs being kept |
11 |
around. |
12 |
|
13 |
-Jeremy |