Archives
Archives
| From: | Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages | ||
| Date: | Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:33:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | e117dbb91003120933n2914be80gd1d2e23be8fe61de@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages by Alexis Ballier |
||
| 1 | On 12 March 2010 16:59, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Or like the old gtk-1: completely abandon the package and let the |
| 3 | > consumers upgrade slowly. IMHO this is the less annoying approach for |
| 4 | > everyone. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Abandoned packages do not belong in the portage tree. That's |
| 7 | why we have a treecleaners project. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Cheers, |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ben de Groot |
| 12 | Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) |
| 13 | ______________________________________________________ |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt3 mask breaks significant science packages | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> |