1 |
On 12.11.2008 11:44, Michael Hammer wrote: |
2 |
> * Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> [081112 00:46]: |
3 |
>> What are others feelings on this? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I like the idea! |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> What issues do you see with having a wiki? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Pages of poor quality with wrong informations. |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a |
12 |
>> wiki? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> We should develop some kind of review process |
15 |
|
16 |
Ugh, got lots of free time? If you want to help, provide hosting or |
17 |
such. A hands off approach should be preferred for wiki. We know it is |
18 |
written by users and some poor quality and even wrong info is expected. |
19 |
Wikis are good for pointers and ideas only. We know that and act |
20 |
accordingly. Moreover, we have official gentoo docs anyway. |
21 |
|
22 |
Developer time is better spent doing, well, developer stuff rather than |
23 |
reviewing some wiki. If you insist on review, it will be at best a |
24 |
stale small site and at worst will cut into your developer time. |
25 |
|
26 |
For what it is worth, as a user I vote you spend time developing gentoo. |
27 |
-- |
28 |
Eray |
29 |
|
30 |
> and at least the |
31 |
> possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases |
32 |
> the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed |
33 |
> section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the |
34 |
> infos provided have a minimum of quality. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> g, mueli |
37 |
> |