| 1 |
Alex Alexander wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really |
| 4 |
>> should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure, |
| 5 |
>> like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree (the current |
| 6 |
>> PORTDIR), /var/portage/distfiles (i.e. split out distfiles from the tree |
| 7 |
>> itself), /var/portage/overlays/layman or /var/portage/layman. |
| 8 |
>> I of course realize that change the structure of the whole portdir would |
| 9 |
>> had inresting complications, so take this comment just as serious as you |
| 10 |
>> like. |
| 11 |
<snip> |
| 12 |
> /var/portage/ |
| 13 |
> /var/portage/tree |
| 14 |
> /var/portage/layman |
| 15 |
> /var/portage/overlays (non-layman managed, layman could also be in here) |
| 16 |
> /var/portage/distfiles |
| 17 |
> /var/portage/packages |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Not that I really care, but are these "portage-only" and we might need |
| 20 |
/var/{paludis,pkgcore,...}/*? So what about /var/gentoo/*? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
/haubi/ |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Michael Haubenwallner |
| 25 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives