Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: migration from uclibc to uclibc-ng | ||
| Date: | Sun, 17 Jul 2016 16:24:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAJ0EP42ibBsA_tfZzHaPjcJhCbLrPmD3jwCSei2D-Rs56jfsmA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: migration from uclibc to uclibc-ng by waltdnes@waltdnes.org | ||
| 1 | On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 8:07 PM, <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 | > I don't know if this is on topic. Is it possible to backport 64-bit |
| 3 | > date/time to uclibc-ng in 32-bit mode? 32-bit date runs between late |
| 4 | > 1901 and early 2038. 2038 is not that far away. E.g. in a 32-bit VM... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | This seems pretty off-topic for this thread. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I think the kernel would need to support 64-bit time interfaces in the |
| 9 | x86 ABI before any libc could use them. |