Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About some developers in devaway status that maybe are no longer active at all
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:03:32
Message-Id: 4E170DFE.4040103@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] About some developers in devaway status that maybe are no longer active at all by Pacho Ramos
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 08/07/2011 04:31 μμ, Pacho Ramos wrote:
5 > Due me recently taking xsane due it being not fixed/updated for a long
6 > time, I noticed its maintainer was in devaway since 2010 September.
7 >
8 > Maybe they should be pinged and retired if no reply is received like
9 > done with other cases. What do you think? :-/
10 >
11 > That people that seems to be inactive for a long time look to be the
12 > following:
13 > http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/
14 >
15 > battousai -> Already in retirement process (but looks stalled since end
16 > 2010, not sure why, probably retirement team didn't have time?) ->
17 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34864
18 >
19 > blackace -> not sure about his current status, looks like he will move
20 > to staffer per https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 , in that
21 > case, maybe his devaway status could be removed.
22 >
23 > falco -> doesn't seem to be active for a long time
24 >
25 > fox2mike -> the same case
26 >
27 > markusle -> already handled in
28 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105599
29 >
30 > mrpouet -> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266794
31 >
32 > phosphan -> looks to be unavailable for some months :-/
33 >
34 > tanderson -> Looks to not have committed for a long time, but I think he
35 > had other responsibilities in Gentoo (maybe the same applies to other
36 > people listed here)
37 >
38 > titefleur -> already handled in
39 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195714
40 >
41 > vorlon -> looks to not have committed everything to the tree since 2010
42 >
43 >
44 >
45 > As some people are already being retired (like mrpouet), I thought that
46 > would be interesting to start dropping them from metadatas of packages
47 > they maintain, moving them to their respective herds or to
48 > maintainer-needed (after sending a mail to gentoo-dev announcing what
49 > packages are up to grabs). I can do this if you want.
50 >
51 >
52 > There are also some devaway entries that could probably be updated or
53 > removed by affected developers :-/
54 >
55 > Best regards and thanks for taking care.
56 Hi,
57
58 Truth is that we do not touch metadata.xml entries or project pages
59 until infra people process the accounts of the inactive developers. When
60 a developer is being processed by the infrastructure team, then we clean
61 metadata.xml entries and the project pages. Additionally, we announce
62 the orphaned packages in -dev-announce mailing list. Here[1] you can see
63 the steps we follow to retire a developer.
64 If you want to see the pending retirements, search bugzilla for bugs
65 assigned to retirement@g.o.
66 As a side note, undertakers team is understaffed so we are not very fast
67 in spotting and warning inactive developers. You can always help us if
68 you want. Just drop an email to us.
69
70 [1]:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/undertakers/
71 - --
72 Regards,
73 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
74 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
75 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
76
77 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOFw3+AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCfRYP/3TzFihi8wla88+JdaoP+iI4
78 FF/mmAD8cc0/J4dWiUc8HX5b42FFui1nmeMMJyZMmizIS+wXosMm52DPX7LZjt2T
79 YxfGuES63dzsdxNZiDCScABsSXB4ayUtXg0JF8Gqn10fXDUwTWQgwtZR2Bw8ZqtU
80 SBer08IWnCIYY8Gkckx+VILCvzoHwQHe31U0Lt+AKkgMc8NMKqUU3DtLRAyWg79P
81 4qVNTm+Vz3UDrdv44nbFViMu/E/UY9t6vInd2JfiPULs5To8pq1/8LZWSqA6I8cO
82 NSz53FDsQi/Bd+hbiBzi5rTR5dPQg+T5UD8DiSndsIuP+08byk9iiQ70eXvtUcbm
83 pr8sNsX8VSYFZd6NrpOVzWu3Jmy+EDDW2ZKCWf/+mO+dkW1KYMI+zSHZINDPDRzJ
84 3KDxTCH+Vcuu9r0P//c07a2HxLvjYD3iH+NCcnjDEgINqpn+EVx43Ouyo8wITeG5
85 4jZVtD9XmCtMSntCxOlSBUyrky4txFA//E/Y9pTuKSeOU06tmdATfxV7UEf41quo
86 vmd9J+oyF/ngvVFT21AnQc5w0Zw8sOdIVcsgxdXrk8B8Vj1ydnaN1ppzDiOKAny0
87 x2NEDjn54whj3Qd3kRL9ldt//YWs1JqmLMS9uhOGiicGh8gA0l+qedoFiC/dUNeb
88 mBoH8KPhviLnIcSUrXnx
89 =E3cM
90 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies