Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Douglas Freed <dwfreed@×××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-08-25 23h59 UTC
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:02:23
Message-Id: CAFyXEpKQJGv3i4u1dP1eXuso8a+3BuzB_-kbgpzaPmHQJSAr_A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-08-25 23h59 UTC by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Aug 26, 2013 12:06 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:56:51AM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
4 > > Seems like a bug with g-d-a because the mail header has not changed.
5 > > The mail itself is proper, nothing wrong with it; the Reply-To header
6 > > should not matter with regards to delivery. We might even risk not
7 > > receiving them if we send them to g-d-a only if there is a bug present.
8 > I have fixed the script to add Reply-To.
9 >
10 > However, where was this change announced to devs? I also can't find any
11 > documentation of it. Please update the Developer Handbook [1], quizzes,
12 > and possibly also the mailing list page.
13 >
14 > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?full=1
15 >
16 > --
17 > Robin Hugh Johnson
18 > Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
19 > E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
20 > GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
21 >
22
23 dilfridge posted to gentoo-dev about a month ago that this was the case:
24
25 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/274905
26
27 (But yes, all the docs should be updated to reflect this)
28
29 -Doug
30 Guy who remembers far too much