Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 04:55:16
Message-Id: 20161125175441.29f499bc@katipo2.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1 by Michael Palimaka
1 On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:41:20 +1100
2 Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Example atom list from a bug with amd64, arm, and x86 in CC:
5 >
6 > =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, arm, and x86
7 > =app-foo/baz-2.3.4 amd64 x86 # will be stabilised on only amd64 and x86
8
9 I was doing this in the past, but there's a reason I stopped:
10
11 Bugzilla-enforced wordwrap ( at least, this is very strict on the bugzilla-email relay )
12
13 > =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, arm, and x86
14
15 Could become more like
16
17 > =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64,
18 > arm, and x86
19
20
21 A literal example of an email I received for a bug I filed ( via an alias ) is attached.
22
23
24 The example I give did not render poorly on bugzilla
25 ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599550 ), but I suspect people
26 who do AT probably prefer their notification emails about needed AT not
27 to be useless.

Attachments

File name MIME type
[Bug 599550] New: dev-perl_DateTime-1.360.0 and deps (re-)keyword request for stable arches text/plain

Replies