1 |
El dom, 10-06-2012 a las 13:25 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: |
2 |
> On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 |
3 |
> Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. Using |
5 |
> > the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], the dbus-glib |
6 |
> > dependency will be expressed with an atom such as dev-libs/glib:2:= |
7 |
> > and the package manager will translate that atom to |
8 |
> > dev-libs/glib:2:=2.32 at build time. So, ':' is always used to |
9 |
> > distinguish SLOT deps, and ':=' is always used to distinguish |
10 |
> > ABI_SLOT deps. Is that syntax good? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Here's a nicer syntax: no ABI_SLOT variable, and SLOT="2/2.32". Then you |
13 |
> can do explicit :2/2.32 dependencies if you like, or :2 (which would |
14 |
> match SLOT="2" or SLOT="2/anything"), or :2= (which gets rewritten |
15 |
> to :2/2.32=) or :2*. If an ebuild does SLOT="2", it's treated as 2/2. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
Looks nice to me :) |