1 |
Mateusz A. Mierzwin'ski wrote: |
2 |
> And I strongly suggest to leave old mechanism of portage, because we saw |
3 |
> couple times what _GREAT_ automatic makes with distro - eg. Mandriva |
4 |
> with all creators and cheap installer - couple apps not running, low |
5 |
> performance. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Don't get me wrong - I also have that problems, and they make me |
8 |
> nervous, but when I think what could I done by automatic replace package |
9 |
> or binary then I get to thinking that everything is ok... |
10 |
|
11 |
Nobody is suggesting getting rid of all blocks or automating upgrades |
12 |
that shouldn't be automated. |
13 |
|
14 |
They're suggesting adding a little more intelligence to the current |
15 |
system. Really safe upgrades might happen automatically. Others might |
16 |
still fail, but would contain more informational errors. Others might |
17 |
just continue as they do currently. |
18 |
|
19 |
You don't complain when you upgrade from shorewall 3.4.7 to 3.4.8 and |
20 |
portage auto-uninstalls 3.4.7 when you're done, do you? The whole point |
21 |
of a package manager is to automate routine and safe activities. The |
22 |
alternative is manual install of tarballs... |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |