| 1 |
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 30 May 2012 07:32:49 -0400 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test the |
| 5 |
>> conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> A mock conversion would probably help with creating procedures/docs/etc |
| 9 |
> as well. It is nice to say that we're "just going to use git" but I |
| 10 |
> think everybody has a slightly different picture of how that is going to |
| 11 |
> work. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I /believe/ such mock conversions had been done, based on previous |
| 14 |
threads here, tho NOT on the SCM-migration list, which would certainly |
| 15 |
have the greater detail. AFAIK the previous sticking points were all |
| 16 |
those still-open bugs, not the general conversion. But the bugs, other |
| 17 |
than documentation, either seem mostly fixed or not so important, any |
| 18 |
more. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Of course, those previous trial runs are probably similarly dated, now, |
| 21 |
so a new one's probably in order with the new perspective on those bug |
| 22 |
priorities, etc, but at least getting the input of someone that was |
| 23 |
involved with them should speed progress over some already covered |
| 24 |
ground, in any case. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
(I've considered following scmm myself, but there's apparently some sort |
| 27 |
of issue between gmane, pan, and lists commonly crossposted between, that |
| 28 |
has already killed project for me, header-fetch does nothing, and scmm |
| 29 |
would almost certainly be similarly dead to me.) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 33 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 34 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives