Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jack Morgan <jmorgan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc Arch status
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 02:54:30
Message-Id: 74055a54-c7ee-790e-953a-ac173dc2bde1@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Sparc Arch status by Jack Morgan
1 Following up to my email from a year ago....
2
3 I've been out for several months and getting back to working on Gentoo.
4 I'd like to provide an update on sparc status...
5
6 On 05/17/15 08:36, Jack Morgan wrote:
7 > All,
8 >
9 > I wanted to send out an update on the Sparc arch team status. My overall
10 > plan is to reduce the total number of keywords for sparcto a more
11 > manageable level. I'd like to continue to have sparc be a stable arch
12 > for gentoo for as long as it makes sense. I'm hoping to get some
13 > feedback from the community as to what should be supported and what can
14 > be reduced.
15
16 We do have some people in the community who are interested in sparc. In
17 fact, we have one kernel developer who would like to get multilib working.
18
19 In addition, I have two who are interested in helping by being arch
20 testers (AT).
21
22
23 > (1) Bugzilla
24 > At the time of writing, here is the bug count for sparc. There is a good
25 > amount of keywording to do here and I'll start working on these in a week.
26 >
27 > sparc: total (172), keywordreq (67), stablereq(85)
28
29 Current count:
30
31 sparc: total (349), keywordreq (76), stablereq(249)
32
33 If you are about to drop the last stable keyworded ebuild, please ping
34 me before hand. I will put it to the top of my queue. This is especially
35 true if its part of the system.
36
37
38 > (2) Installation (Wiki/Releng)
39 > The documentation is up to date and accurate. Thanks doc team! I
40 > recently did a fresh install so the current iso and stage3 work well.
41 > The stage3 need to be updated because they include perl-18 instead of
42 > perl-20. Otherwise, the install process is stable on my system.
43
44 We really need an updated ISO and stage tarballs.
45
46 > (3) Infra
47 > There is one developer machine[1] to use for keyword testing. Please
48 > request access from the contact in you would like a shell account.
49
50 We still have a system for all to use.
51
52 > (4) Profiles
53 >
54 > (a) systemd support
55 > I tried for several days to get systemd working on sparc. systemd just
56 > seg faulted on boot up. In fact, I had trouble getting udev to start. It
57 > just produced an error "ignoring: Invalid argument error initializing
58 > netlink socket" and didn't start. Since udev didn't start, i was not
59 > able to log in nor ssh (no network interface found). I made the switch
60 > to eudev and eudev started just fine. I'll file a couple of bugs in a
61 > week and go from there. I'll work with the systemd team to resolve these
62 > problems.
63
64 No update here and not sure of the status as I need to investigate
65
66 > (b) gnome/kde desktop support
67 > I'd like to propose dropping support for gnome/kde desktop if systemd
68 > isn't supported on sparc. I'm note sure it makes sense long term nor
69 > have developer resources to continue to keyword it. I have a couple of
70 > desktop systems so can test easily but running xfce4 atm. I'm open to
71 > others opinions.
72
73 I'm going to drop support for all desktops except xfce4. If someone else
74 wants to help out and support another desktop, they are free to join the
75 team and do so.
76
77
78 > (c) java support
79 > The java team said they don't have cycles to support sparc. Support
80 > would have to come from the sparc team or the community. Unless someone
81 > steps up to help out with java, I'll propose to drop support on sparc.
82 > Thanks to the java team for helping us know what needs to be done to
83 > support java or not.
84
85 Support already dropped last year. Thanks java team.
86
87 > (5) anything else?
88 > Is there anything I missed? Other sections of gentoo?
89
90 I need to schedule the annual arch team meeting to elect the arch lead.
91 Current members are are listed below. If you are not actively working on
92 sparc, then please update you status.
93
94 Lead(s) none (No lead election date set)
95
96
97 Members
98 Agostino Sarubbo (ago) - Security bugs primarily )
99 Jeroen Roovers (jer) - ( Porting )
100 Jack Morgan (jmorgan) - ( Gentoo/SPARC )
101 Pacho Ramos (Pacho) - ( Gentoo/SPARC )
102 Mike Frysinger (vapier) - ( Core-only )
103 Michael Weber (xmw) - ( Gentoo/SPARC )
104 Mikle Kolyada (Zlogene) - ( Gentoo/SPARC )
105
106
107
108 > [1]https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Developer_Machines
109
110 Thanks,
111 --
112 Jack Morgan
113 Pub 4096R/761D8E0A 2010-09-13 Jack Morgan <jmorgan@g.o>
114 Fingerprint = DD42 EA48 D701 D520 C2CD 55BE BF53 C69B 761D 8E0A

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc Arch status alexmcwhirter@×××××××.us
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc Arch status Jason Zaman <perfinion@g.o>